Friday, March 13, 2015

Revolutionary Aid from a Transvestite! ....... So Now You Know!



Revolutionary Aid from a Transvestite
In 1775, Arthur Lee, a colonial agent for Massachusetts, met French playwright Caron de Beaumarchais in England. With the American Revolution already in its infant stages, Lee lost no time trying to persuade Beaumarchais that the French government should strike at it sold enemy, the English, by aiding the colonies. When Beaumarchais returned home, he carried Lee’s message to the French court. Spurred on by his efforts, the French government supplied approximately 90 percent of the munitions used by the colonists in the first two years of the war. Eventually, of course, the French entered the war on the side of the Americans. Almost every contemporary observer and historian agrees that without the aid of the French, the American Revolution would have taken a very different course.
But why was Beaumarchais in England? The man who was instrumental in persuading the French to help the colonies was traveling on a secret mission to retrieve stolen documents from the Chevalier d’Eon, a transvestite, about whose sex no one was certain. D’Eon was a championship fencer – in the female competition. Once, a captain of the Grenadiers proposed to d’Eon. Some contemporaries even reported that Beaumarchais believed d’Eon was in love with the playwright. On the other hand, d’Eon was also a captain of the French dragoons and a former diplomatic agent – both male occupations. At d’Eon’s death in 1810, over thirty-five years later, an autopsy found “the male organs of generation perfectly formed in every respect.” ………. So Now You Know!

Wednesday, March 11, 2015

The Battle of Bunker Hill ...... So Now You Know!





The Battle of Bunker Hill
The Battle of Bunker Hill was the first major conflict of the American Revolution. Unfortunately, it did not occur on Bunker Hill. The revolutionary Committee of Safety ordered colonial officers to seize and fortify Bunker Hill against possible attack from British regiments attempting to control Boston Harbor. But colonial military leaders, for reasons still unknown, entrenched instead on Breed’s Hill, a smaller mound some two thousand feet away. The famous battle occurred on that hill, on June 17, 1775 but the popularly became known as the Battle of Bunker Hill. Today, Breed’s Hill, where the battle took place, is known as Bunker Hill. The original Bunker Hill is covered with houses …….. So now you know!

Marriage Pointers from someone whose marriage failed... but I learned something for next time!



What makes a good marriage?

First off you have to be best friends. You really have to like each other to last. When the sex becomes less important, you better enjoy doing things together (while still doing things apart). You should never fight about money. Financial problems lead to divorce. You don’t want your relationship to deteriorate over something as inconsequential as money. Everyone goes through financial ups and downs, including bouts of unemployment and significant credit-card debt. Never cat blame and remain calm during financial discussions.
Never discuss sensitive subjects when hungry or tired. My advice, eat marshmallows to improve communication. What’s the one thing you can’t possibly do with a mouthful of marshmallows? Talk. Communication is more about listening than talking. I always tell my partner that if I say something and it can be interpreted two ways and one of those ways makes them sad or angry, I meant it the other way. A good marriage is made up of a thousand small kindnesses.
Purposely sit next to your spouse on the couch each night. My father told me to be sure to do this when I got married. It makes it impossible not to physically touch each other. Always find thing to laugh about. Laugh together. Times are tough; tragedy happens in all families, things will go wrong. But if you find ways to laugh about it, you’ll form a special bond and can overcome anything.
Women want to be loved and cherished. Men want to feel respected …. Even more than they want to feel loved. This might sound odd but it’s true. Don’t emasculate your man. Don’t take your woman for granted. Life gets messy, boring and stressful. Your marriage will have seasons when it’s stronger or when it feels anemic. Whatever you did in the early days that made you laugh together, make time to do those same things again. Read to each other from a favorite funny book. Watch a favorite funny movie.
Keep a date night. One night a month go out as a couple. It doesn’t have to be just you two, Go with other adults or couples. This allows you to have adult conversation and keeps you from hashing over household problems. Unless you have a baby under six months, no children allowed. Don’t discuss problems or major issues. The activity doesn’t have to be expensive.
Each person should seek to do good for the other person, instead of fighting over ‘What about me??’ Then the experience is one where each person is giving and serving the other. A win-win solution. Plan forward and look back only to the good times. Everybody has their rough spots, but if everything is focused on the past hard times, your marriage can become like an albatross. Remember and revel in your successes. Ignore the times when you failed. Don’t look at problems to place blame, only to find solutions. Love is like a boomerang, throw it at your spouse and you’ll find it coming right back to you.
In the toughest times, couples need to remember why they got together in the first place. Put your relationship first. Be open and flexible to change. Adapt. These tidbits sound ordinary but I’ve seen many relationships break up because one or both partners refuse to do these ‘common sense’ things.
Be passionate, supportive and accepting of what the other person is doing in their personal life. We all know it’s important to be an individual. We each have things we want to get done personally. We want our work goals not just to be supported but also understood and facilitated. It won’t be easy.
Mind your manners. Too often we show more respect to strangers than to those we love. Parents often expect manner from their kids but don’t use them with each other. ‘Please hand me that plate’ is kinder, gentler than, ‘Hand me that.’ Would you, could you, please, sorry – these are magic words. They’re not just for dating.
Share a common dream. When a couple has that, every bump in the road is on the way to somewhere that matters. Without a dream, every bump in the road is a mountain to climb over. Finding your dharma, or what your unique service is to the planet, creating a larger context of meaning in life, puts the little stuff in perspective and makes it easy to process.
If you’re in it for life, you’re both going to do a lot of growing up and maturing over the years – you have to stay intimately in touch with each others growth over all this time or you end up not knowing the person you’re married to as he/she changes over the years.
I know it’s too late for me to salvage my previous marriage but I have learned a lot from it. Next time I will follow my own advice that I have put forth here and I know that my next wife will be the happiest woman on this earth! I promise you that!

Thursday, September 11, 2014

The Slaves Get Their Day ....




The Slaves Get Their Day
In the eighteenth century the slave was hardly better off than he was in the nineteenth century. But there were times when it seemed that he was. When the governor of Virginia wanted to make sure that his slaves did not get drunk on the Queen’s Birthday in 1711, he had to bargain with them. In exchange for their good behavior on that day, he promised to allow them to become drink as they wished the following day. The bargain worked well for both parties: the governor had well-behaved servants on the Queen’s Birthday; the slaves enjoyed an extraordinary feast the next day. In the nineteenth century the master would probably never have bargained with the slaves; he would simply order them to do as he wished.
The slaves who worked for William Bryd of Westover, one of Virginia’s most prominent landowners, were not half as fortunate as those who labored for the governor. Byrd often whipped his slaves, many times for no good reason. Once he whipped one of his slaves to punish his wife. She had whipped one of his slaves after he warned her not to. So he retaliated by whipping one of her slaves. In his diary, where he tells about the incident, he does not say if his whipping had a chastening effect on his wife.

Wednesday, June 11, 2014

Been a while since I posted .... Whats Up?

In March my life changed completely on the evening after I had the procedure you get when you turn 50 years old. No, dear readers I'm fine, but my mother was taken out of the house by ambulance.

Danny Pink In The Tardis????



New Doctor Who companion Danny Pink raises lots of questions
Danny Pink is billed as a recurring character but will he be travelling in the Tardis?
Some aspects of Doctor Who’s reboot season eight, starring Peter Capaldi, are becoming clear. And today we’ve learnt about a new character we’ll meet – Danny Pink played by Samuel Anderson.
So what do we know so far? The BBC have revealed a picture of Danny and apparently he’s a fellow teacher who will be joining companion Clara Oswald (Jenna Coleman) and the Doctor on their travels.
Is he a full companion? Unknown. The term that seems to be popular is that he is a recurring character. There’s a fine tradition of that in Who. The fan favourite is surely the Brigadier who was a stalwart in the classic series alongside a number of Doctors.
MORE: Introducing Danny Pink – Doctor Who gets a new male companion
I wonder if Pink is Clara’s new squeeze? Here’s hoping not. We had quite enough of that (and hanky panky in the Tardis) with Amy and Rory. And actually sometimes those three-hand stories with the Doctor could be a bit claggy. And thinking back to Tennant and Eccleston: when Rose brought Mickey along it did sometimes spoil the fun.
There’s no doubt that the Doctor Who dynamic with a companion is at its most lively when it’s him and one companion. And that’s usually a woman. The presence of Mr A.N. Other does sometimes get in the way of a fast-paced adventure.
And what is it about Coal Hill School in East London, Shoreditch to be precise, that keeps bringing the Doctor back? It was a cute hat-tip in the Day of the Doctor that Clara should be teaching there but now it seems like the Moff, who never does anything just for the fun of it, has a purpose.
MORE: 15 nostalgic classic Doctor Who hat-tips in the Day of the Doctor – what did you spot?
Coal Hill was where it all began when teachers Barbara Wright and Ian Chesterton were baffled by that unearthly child Susan Foreman (the Doctor’s granddaughter) all the way back in 1963 and episode one. Fearful of being exposed, he kidnapped them both and so began Doctor Who.
And the Doctor has returned to the school at least once. In Remembrance of the Daleks in 1988 it served as base for those dastardly foes from Skaro. And in the 1986 Colin Baker adventure, the sixth Doctor landed not so far away at the junkyard of I. M. Foreman at 76 Totter’s Lane. That was where the first Doctor originally concealed the Tardis.
Doctor Who: Coal Hill school
Coal Hill school is part of Doctor Who’s mythology (Picture: BBC)
So Steven Moffat is quite clearly plugging himself into the original Doctor Who myth with this one. And with a whole new cycle of lives, once again he will be traveling through the universe with two teachers from Coal Hill School in tow.
MORE: Doctor Who – Peter Capaldi’s new outfit is superb and hints at sterner, more serious Doctor
And there must be more to it than that? In the original series Barbara Wright taught history there, just like Clara does. Ian Chesterton taught science, I wonder if Danny Pink does too?
And is there the prospect of an old face returning too? One I. Chesterton was noted as the Chair of Governors at Coal Hill in The Day of the Doctor. It would be wonderful to see William Russell reprise his role

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Artificial Intelligence .........just a thought

The Living and the Dead

In “Artificial Intelligence”



We see in the film, “Artificial Intelligence” many examples of the close relationship between the living and the dead. We see this multi-layered relationship throughout the story of David, the robot protagonist. It is a universal concept that all living things must feed off of things that once lived. We must eat dead organisms to gain nutrients to remain alive. This is true on an artistic and cultural level as well. Another reason the living need the dead is simply a matter of a limited supply of natural resources. If the living never died there would be no room for new life. This is another theme of the film. One other relationship the living share with the dead in this film is emotional. Characters sometimes react to death with mourning and melancholia. The main goal of this paper is to show how “Artificial Intelligence” is a story about how death is a crucial part of life, and more of a transformation rather than simply the end of one’s existence. That one must die or at least be able to die in order to truly live.

The opening sequence takes us through a brief history of the apocalypse. We are shown a vast sweeping glance across the flooded Earth as the narrator calmly explains what we are seeing. His voice is reverent almost mournful. This helps to set the tone for the film. The camera shows us the physical frame of the world as the narrator tells us the historical frame. We see this two part framing again later in the story as we are introduced to a new stage of the apocalypse. The camera sweeps along a frozen world of Manhattan with a new form of life flying along the landscape with us in their ships. They are archeologists, there to observe the dead. They chip away at a past world covered in ice.

This chipping away at the ice is a metaphor of the journey or coming to life story of the robots of this film, particularly David and Joe. When they are first introduced to us they are cold, mechanical, and run strictly by protocol. As the story progresses that coldness is chipped away. In an early scene Joe walks into a room to carry out his duty as a digital prostitute. Up until this moment he seems innocent to the fact that he is causing any harm to those he is programmed to serve. When he finds a woman he is programmed to serve is dead, lying on the bed, he shutters. The husband is in the room with them and tells her to remember that she killed him long before he killed her. He knows Joe hears this, but acknowledges Joe’s inherent innocence as he takes no revenge on him. He simply asks, “How many seconds has it been?” He sees Joe as a just a glorified stopwatch, and leaves him be. After that moment, the death of a woman he slept with, he becomes more aware of the consequences of his actions. He learns accountability, becomes more human, more alive.

David’s journey is similar. He is a different type of love mimicking robot. His very existence is in reaction to a death of Professor Hobby’s son. His development came years after the initial development of artificial intelligence. This came after the apocalyptic flood, one that killed off hundreds of millions of humans. Death, limited resources, and the need for mechanized labor spawned the creation of robots in the world of this film. David’s model came after many upgrades in technology and many generations of artificial intelligence. Professor Hobby created David to match his son’s appearance and likely his personality. If the real life version of David never had died, the new version of David would have never been created or needed. David is later programmed to love a grieving mother named Monica. David’s services are rendered as she attempts to replace the loss of her son due to an uncured disease. She does this by reading a specific sequence of words, a code that initiates his child like love programming. The need for David’s services, as far as his initial design, is shattered the day the sick boy, Martin recovers. Since he does not die, David becomes a pending second child.

David can not compete with the original biological child, as we see in a heart wrenching sequence. Martin sees David as competition. Like the jealous husband, Martin see’s that the one’s he loves have attempted to replace him. Unlike the jealous husband, he does assign the blame to the robot. Perhaps this is because he lacks an adult perspective and can not justly analyze the situation. He is too innocent to recognize the actions of his parents as a type of temporary abandonment. As we see it, Martin comes back to life after his parents have considered him as good as dead. Martin responds by putting David in his place. He talks to him like he would any robot. He asks “what can you do?” He compares him to his old toy Teddy and even mocks him at the dinner table by showing him how to eat. David becomes fed up with the rivalry and attempts to eat as well. This causes his face to distort as though he were having a stroke. As we cut to the next scene we get a shocking reminder that David is a robot. The technicians have his abdomen opened up as they vacuum up the spinach. They give him a nickname as they clean him, “Robo boy” as if they are attempting to comfort a real boy. He is their creation so maybe they feel he does have sentiment.

David is ultimately rejected by his programmed mother. He is let go by Monica because he proves to be a threat to their real son’s life. The scene where David grabs on to Martin for protection is full of metaphorical imagery. The boys are shirtless, so we see that David fits in superficially. One boy even comments on how real he looks. When David pulls Martin into the pool with him he initiates a type of baptism. Baptism symbolizes death, burial, and rebirth. David seems to fall to the bottom, motionless, while Kevin struggles to break free. Martin is pried free by people who care for him, while David is left for dead at the bottom of the pool. We never see how he gets out. This scene is mirrored towards the end of the film when David is once again buried underwater. Again he is left for dead, entombed in ice and metal. This time he is preserved in an amphibian police aircraft as a type of metal and glass casket. It is quit appropriate for a robot, opposed to having a casket made of wood or anything else organic. If we look back earlier in the film we see Martin in a similar metal and glass tomb. This is one where he too is buried alive and frozen, also awaiting an advancement in technology. In both cases they are brought back to life by eager hands.

This film uses mirroring over and over, visually as well as thematically. One scene that shows a mirroring in behaviors is when David returns to Manhattan. Just like Martin, he returns home believing that he is an only child only to find another child, another David. The protagonist David says “you can’t have her.” He takes a lamp and beheads his competition. Of course he doesn’t realize that the other David has no intentions of competing for Monica’s love. He doesn’t realize that in that way he is unique, that he is the only David emotionally tied to Monica. All he see’s is a room stocked full of replicas of himself, mirror images, competition. Professor Hobby tries to help David understand how he really is special, being the first of a kind. But even Professor Hobby knows that his real son can not be replaced by his replica. These series of events kill David’s innocence. But within the same scene he is born again.

David is born again as he relives his birth. He walks up to a copy of his face held by a machine by a chair he glimpses through the eyes up at the “Bird” he drew for Martin. The bird he saw as his first memory. This imagery is mirrored not too much later as he pulls the police amphiblicopter up to the blue fairy. Her eyes overlap his in the reflection of the windshield. He rests there and begins to pray. He becomes entombed there with Teddy after the Ferris wheel collapses. First the floodlights die out. Then he is left praying in the dark, hoping to be transformed into a real live boy. He doesn’t try to escape. He is exactly where he wants to be, pending in a glass coffin, reflecting the scene with Martin. But in Martin’s scene the lady on the outside was praying for him to live.

We should also look briefly at the flesh fair. This scene brings up death in a new light. In fact the scene is lit up quit dramatically. It is a celebration, but of what, life or death, or both? It is called a flesh fair, but they are burning and melting metal. So do they consider these machines to be flesh, or is it an ironical name for a brutal event? The stadium is a coliseum reflecting the brutality of those of ancient Rome. We see gladiator types, chopping robots in half, and bike riders with lions on their helmets. All of this with a heavy metal band accompanying the destruction. One line of dialogue stands out, given by a captured robot. He explains to David that they are doing this “to maintain numerical superiority.” The Orga need the Mecha to die so they can remain domineers. Since the life expectancy of a mechanical life form is so much greater than an organic life form, they must be destroyed in order keep that balance.

This film brings up another important relationship between the dead and the living. Without the living, the dead would have no means to leave their legacy. There would be no “enduring memory of all man kind” without David. David carries with him memories of human art, music, and culture. The new life forms that dig David up 2000 years after his burial say that he is unique in all the world. They say that humans may hold the meaning of existence because of their abundance of culture, music, and art. Now David is the one who can not be replaced. So these new life forms give him whatever he wants. They want him to be happy. They need him to be happy. They recognize a need for him to not just exist, but to live…to become fulfilled. And so they bring back from the dead the one person who can provide that, his mommy. After she fulfills her purpose she dies again, and David goes “to the place where dreams are born.” The lights in the room go out and the film fades to black. The story dies, and the audience can then return to their other lives, but with new incites. The film gives us a few moments to mourn at the end. The music helps the transition as familiar scores allow us to relive moments from the film, until finally we are expected to move on. But can we? We are but another layer of reflection of this film, as we write and discuss the themes within, we perpetuate the them and give them enduring life.

“Artificial Intelligence” gives us several examples of characters that must, on some level die before they can really live. The film itself is a symbol of a life. It fades from black, goes through many stages of character development, and then fades back to black at the end. By featuring mechanical life forms as its protagonists this film makes us ask, what does it mean to be alive? Joe tells David “I am. I was.” He certainly made an impact in the world he participated in. A woman is now dead and a jealous husband too. But he also made it possible for David to come to a greater understanding of his reality. The more a being is aware of reality the more real they become. It took the deaths of millions for David to be created and several more to fuel changes in the world around him in order to get him to the point where he could discover who he really was and to become sentient. David had to be kicked out of the nest in order to grow up. He had to learn that death was a part of life, and experience it first hand as he watched the one he loved die. That experience, having her tell him that she loved him followed by her death gave him the closure he looked to the blue fairy to provide. It wasn’t a blue fairy who really granted him that, but a blue alien projecting the blue fairy. Even at the end of the film David was not fully aware, but the end gives us hope. He has become more aware than he was when he was first built. Perhaps he would need to evolve somehow beyond his circuitry in order to reach a higher level of spiritual life. Much of human’s art, religion and culture claims that this evolution happens after death. You leave your mortal shell and move onto a new realm of existence. Ironically his prolonged life cycle only delayed his confrontation of death, and further progression. David, as far as we see, has not yet reached that point, he remains in his original physical form, but he has evolved to a point where he can now dream, and grasp more deeply what it means to be human, to be “a real live boy”.